This open letter to the Global Fund Board was drafted in advance of its Thirty-Second Meeting, and signed by 24 civil society organisations from around the world. The letter details grave concerns regarding the impact of the funding allocation methodology applied to middle-income countries (MICs) or those transitioning to middle-income status, and the ultimate consequences this will have on key affected populations.

Keep up-to-date with drug policy developments by subscribing to the IDPC Monthly Alert.

Open letter of civil society organisations to the Global Fund board in advance to its thirty-second meeting

Around the word, criminal justice–led approaches to drugs have resulted in mass incarceration, increases in crime, insecurity, and public health crises. Now, a coalition of human rights groups are calling on the United Nations to fully account for the true costs of the “war on drugs.”

The United Nations is bracing for an international debate on global drug policy, scheduled for 2016. The UN is organizing the 2016 Drug Summit in response to demands by Latin American leaders who have called for a reassessment of current drug policies.

Several partners from the Count the Costs coalition will speak at Open Society Foundations about the drug war’s impact on human rights, health, and security.

Count the costs of the war on drugs

With marijuana legalisation measures passing in Oregon, Alaska and Washington, D.C., and with groundbreaking criminal justice reforms passing in California and New Jersey, there's no longer any denying that drug policy reform is a mainstream -- and quite urgent -- political demand.

These wins will boost efforts already underway in states such as California, Massachusetts, Maine, Nevada and Arizona to end marijuana prohibition in 2016, as well as efforts in Congress and around the country to scale back the disastrous policies of mass incarceration.

And speaking of 2016, yesterday's results now mean that Presidential candidates and other prominent candidates for public office will have no choice but to take positions on these issues, which could prove to be another tipping point in national politics. While some major politicians have yet to evolve on marijuana legalization and drug policy reform, that’s likely to change in the coming months and years, as drug war proponents start to pay a heftier price at the polls for their cluelessness.

Election 2014: North Americans ready to end the war on drugs

By Takayuki Harada, Global Drug Policy Program, Open Society Foundations

Asia boasts some of the harshest laws in the world, including the death penalty for drugs and caning of drug users. These laws steer people away from lifesaving health services and fill prisons with people in need of treatment.

However, there are regional pioneers that are charting new courses on drug policy. With the support of the Open Society Foundations, researchers from Mejiro University went on a fact-finding mission to learn about alternative approaches in the region and beyond.

In Taiwan, we encountered a burgeoning harm reduction movement that is successfully stemming a startling increase in HIV. For example, there were typically a few hundred new HIV infections per year, but in 2004, the number increased to 1,520. The following year, 3,380 new infections were detected, most from injecting drug users.

In response, the Centers for Disease Control in Taiwan introduced harm reduction services that prioritized prevention of HIV, including needle exchanges and methadone maintenance therapy. Currently, about 20,000 syringe and needle kits are distributed every month in Taiwan. Since used syringes and needles are exchanged with new ones, 90 percent of the distributed syringes and needles have been collected.

Moving the needle on drug policy in Asia

The Middle East and North Africa Harm Reduction Association “MENAHRA” concluded the third regional meeting for religious leaders entitled “Validation Meeting for the Development of Guidelines for Religious Leaders on Harm Reduction” that was held from November 25 to 27, 2014 at Gefinor Rotana Hotel in Beirut, Lebanon. The meeting was comprised of twelve Muslim and Christian religious leaders from Jordan, Tunisia, Syria, Lebanon, Egypt and Morocco in addition to MENAHRA’s team. The meeting was facilitated by the regional consultant Ms. Rana Haddad.

The objective of the meeting was to develop guidelines for religious leaders on communicating with the people who use drugs and their communities on harm reduction.

During the meeting, the participants reviewed the results of the previous meetings and the objective of the guidelines. The three day meeting was participatory and interactive with the leaders with fruitful discussions and debates. In addition, the religious leaders reviewed the guide, made recommendations for amendments, and added religious texts to its chapters.

Finally, a work plan was developed with the emphasis on the necessity to shed light on the role of religious leaders.

Religious leaders from the Middle East develop guidelines on harm reduction

The International Drug Policy Consortium (IDPC) is delighted to open a new job opportunity - we are looking for a Regional Consultant to help us implement our advocacy work in Africa.

The successful candidate will be responsible for liaising with members, civil society partners, policy makers and other key stakeholders from across the region. The consultant will support delivery of IDPC’s work plan for Africa, and focuses initially on a programme of outreach and advocacy alongside the West Africa Commission on Drugs. The role may be expanded as and when new projects and funding becomes available. For more information about our advocacy project in West Africa, please click here.

For more information about the position and requirements, please read the ToR below.

Please apply by sending your CV, cover letter and examples of written work to Jamie Bridge at jbridge@idpc.net before Friday 19th December 2014!

Keep up-to-date with drug policy developments by subscribing to the

IDPC recruits Regional Consultant for Africa

Switzerland has always played a pioneering role in drug policy. In 1986, it was the first to open shelters for addicts and in 1994 it medically prescribed heroin. Today, its cities are looking at introducing cannabis social clubs – a controversial issue.

Former interior minister Ruth Dreifuss, nicknamed “dealer of the nation” for introducing ground-breaking drug policies, is one of the figureheads of the country’s legalisation campaign. One of her suggestions is to set up cannabis clubs, a concept her native Geneva is spearheading in Switzerland. Larger cities like Geneva, Bern, Basel and Zurich have created an expert working group to map out the details for a potential pilot project.

“We propose experimenting with a possible new model because we need evidence of how the black market, crime and public health would change as a result of regulation,” Dreifuss, also a member of the Global Commission on Drug Policy, explained. “The pilot project will give us experience and facts so we can design a new policy.”

The idea is to set up clubs where anyone over 18 can smoke marijuana in a regulated setting. The original concept was conceived in 2005 by the European Coalition for Just and Effective Drug Policies (ENCOD), a pan-European network of 140 NGOs and individuals.

Cannabis legalisation returns on the Swiss agenda

The Global Fund called for the closure of compulsory treatment programs to change sexual orientation, compulsory rehabilitation of sex workers and compulsory drug detention centers. The Global Fund committed not to finance programs in such facilities.

The Strategy, Investment and Impact Committee of the Global Fund Board reported to a meeting of the full Board on 20-21 November that under a new policy the Global Fund explicitly refuses to fund programs with compulsory treatment.

The Global Fund is committed to ensuring that programs it supports do not infringe upon human rights. The United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Right to Health and other UN experts have found that these programs frequently include torture, cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment, as well as forced labor, among other abuses. Twelve UN agencies have called for the closure of compulsory drug detention and rehabilitation programs.

“The evidence is overwhelming that compulsory treatment facilities for sex workers and drug users, and programs that seek to change sexual orientation, are not scientifically valid and undermine the fight against HIV, TB and malaria,” said Mark Dybul, Executive Director of the Global Fund. “Trust is essential in the relationship between health workers and patients. The fear of compulsory treatment drives people underground and makes it harder to reach them.”

Global Fund calls for the end of compulsory treatment

Even as it was making its way to the statutes, New Zealand’s Psychoactive Substances Bill was the talk of the drug reform world. It was seen as a bold, visionary bid to deal with the proliferation of new drugs that fell outside existing laws and address the harms of an unregulated market.

It was all the more remarkable that the reform was being championed by a former drug warrior in Associate Health Minister Peter Dunne. When our Parliament passed the Psychoactive Substances Act last year with but a single vote against, it seemed New Zealand had taken a remarkable initiative.

And then, only months into the new world, the government rushed through an amendment that cut off a protracted interim licensing phase, halted the legal sale of all psychoactive substances and made any future approval much more challenging. It happened so quickly that one journalist landed here with a story commission from a major American magazine, knowing reform had been cut short after she’d booked her flights.

The twilight state of the Psychoactive Substances Act in New Zealand

Of the 58 countries in the world that still have the death penalty in place, over half have made it applicable to people who have committed, for the most part, non-violent drug crimes.

Last year, at least seven countries carried out executions for people convicted of drug-related offences, ranging from international drug trafficking and manufacturing, to growing and simple possession.

In its 2012 report, Harm Reduction International estimated that out of the 33 countries that still impose the death penalty for drug-related offences, actual executions took place in 12-14 countries over the previous five years. In the past 12 years a number of countries have begun to abolish the death penalty for drug crimes, including Tajikistan and Jordan. The Kyrgyz Republic, Uzbekistan and the Philippines, meanwhile, have all made reforms and totally abolished the death penalty for all offences.

Many of the countries included in the map below have not carried out executions for drugs crimes in a number of years, with the penalty more of a symbolic one. However, even a small number of countries maintaining this practice is completely unacceptable, and wholly disproportionate.

Interactive map: Drug offences and the death penalty

The struggle to open a supervised injection site in Ottawa is frequently dominated by experts and politicians. The purpose of this film is to provide a voice to the 3000-5000 intravenous drug users in Ottawa, to allow the people who would benefit most from a supervised injection site to be heard.

The limits of compassion: The struggle to open a safe injection room in Ottawa

Мы – организации, представляющие гражданское общество, включая сообщества людей, живущих с тремя заболеваниями, т.е. основные затронутые группы из разных стран Восточной Европы и Центральной Азии (ВЕЦА) и партнерские организации из других регионов, – в этом письме хотели бы рассказать членам Правления Глобального фонда об уроках, полученных в процессе реализации нового подхода Глобального фонда к распределению ресурсов, и в особенности – о том негативном воздействии, которое этот подход, вероятно, окажет на деятельность программ снижения вреда и финансирование программ в ВЕЦА в 2015-2017 годах.

Оставайтесьвкурсесобытийнаркополитики, подписавшисьна

News